Skip to content
SUJATA CHAUDHRI IP ATTORNEYS
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Practice Areas
  • Updates
    • Stance
    • Updates from Courts and Registry
    • Other Updates
  • Careers
  • Lending a Hand
  • Contact Us

Author: Anand Kumar

Exercise Diligence And Show Bonafide Before Fixing Third Party Marks: Bombay High Court

June 30, 2021January 10, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Our Associate, Anand Kumar discusses “Exercise Diligence And Show Bonafide Before Fixing Third Party Marks: Bombay High Court “ On June 16, 2021, the Bombay High Court, in Pidilite Industries Ltd. vs. Q-Chem Sealers Pvt Ltd., ordered Q-Chem Sealers Pvt Ltd. (Defendant)…

Read More

Every Green And Yellow Colored With Double Dimple Designed Soap Is Not Dettol: Delhi High Court

January 15, 2021January 10, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Our Associate, Anand Kumar discusses “Every Green And Yellow Colored With Double Dimple Designed Soap Is Not Dettol: Delhi High Court” The Delhi High Court denied an interim injunction to RB Health (US) LLC and Anr. (“Plaintiff”) who sought to restrain Dabur…

Read More

Rules of Procedure Are Hand Maiden To The Ends Of Justice: IPAB

September 18, 2020January 10, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Our Associate, Anand Kumar discusses “Rules of Procedure Are Hand Maiden To The Ends Of Justice: IPAB” “The Rules of Limitation are not meant to destroy the rights of parties but to ensure that the parties do not resort to dilatory tactics”…

Read More

Magical Combat Of Noodles

July 13, 2020January 10, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Our Associate, Anand Kumar discusses “Magical Combat Of Noodles” Recently, in  ITC Limited vs Nestle India Limited (C.S.No.231 of 2013), the Madras High Court denied a permanent injunction to ITC Limited (“Plaintiff”).  In this case, the Plaintiff sought to restrain Nestle India…

Read More

Intermediaries’ Liability In Defamation Tussle

June 22, 2020January 11, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Our Associate, Anand Kumar discusses “Intermediaries’ Liability In Defamation Tussle “ On June 2, 2020, the Delhi High Court, in Sasikala Pushpa v. Facebook India & Ors., decided an important question concerning the role and liability of intermediaries in the context of…

Read More

AMADAY v. ANADAY

May 14, 2020January 10, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Our Associate, Anand Kumar discusses “AMADAY v. ANADAY” The Hon’ble Delhi High Court, in an order dated May 6, 2020, refused to pass an order of interim injunction in favour of Ajanta Pharma Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) against use of the mark ANADAY by…

Read More

An Attempt to Strike Balance in Between E-commerce Business and Direct Selling Entities’ IP Rights

February 14, 2020January 10, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Recently in Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Amway India Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. &Ors. FAO(OS) 133/2019 and CM APPL. 32954/2019, while setting aside a Single Judge decision, a two-judge bench addressed key issues concerning e-commerce portals and Direct Selling Entities (“DSE”) such…

Read More

Doctrine Of Estoppel By Acquiescence

December 11, 2019January 10, 2022Anand Kumar
stance

Recently in Make My Trip (India) Private Limited vs. Make My Travel (India) Private Limited CS(COMM) 889/2018, I.As. 6896/2018 & 8837/2018, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court discussed the ‘doctrine of acquiescence” under the law on trade marks. The Plaintiff, Make My Trip…

Read More

CONTACT INFORMATION

Address: 2106 Express Trade Towers 2,
First Floor, B-36, Sector 132, Expressway,
NOIDA, Uttar Pradesh, India 201301

Email: info@sc-ip.in

Phone: 0120-6233100





CONTACT US

    • Home
    • About Us
    • Team
    • Practice Areas
    • Updates
    • Careers
    • Lending a Hand
    • Contact Us

    Lawyer Zone by Acme Themes
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Home
    • Lending a Hand
    • Other Updates
    • Our Team
    • Practice Areas
    • Stance
    • Updates
    • Updates from Courts and Registry

    Request a Quote

    Criminal Enforcement

    We understand that, once our clients obtain IP rights in India, whether through use or registration, the real challenge lies in being able to protect and secure those rights. Our attorneys are adept at providing creative field solutions entailing in-depth investigations and trap purchases, while also handling the ensuing enforcement procedure by coordinating with local government authorities and obtaining the requisite permissions to bring the matter to its logical conclusion. Whether through conducting criminal raids or shutting down counterfeit operations, our hands-on approach places emphasis on effectively combating brand dilution.

    Trademark Oppositions

    The importance of keeping IP registers clean through regular monitoring and oppositions cannot be overemphasized! Our attorneys understand this, and we advise clients on taking pre-emptive measures by first trying to settle with the erring party, or opposing if settlement is not forthcoming.

    Domain Name Disputes

    Domain names are source identifiers in the virtual world! We routinely advise clients on domain names issues, including disputes. Our attorneys have substantial experience, and have successfully, handled domain name disputes at various for a such as the WIPO, NAF and NIXI (the National Internet Exchange of India).

    Thank you for showing interest in interning with Sujata Chaudhri IP Attorneys.

    Our Internship Committee reviews internship applications 2-3 months prior to the month in which internships are to be offered. If your resume is shortlisted for an internship with us, we will get back to you on the email ID youve provided.

    Thank you for showing interest in securing a position with Sujata Chaudhri IP Attorneys.

    We will review your application shortly. If your application is shortlisted for the next round, you will receive an email from us on the email ID youve provided.

    As you would understand, given the large number of applications we receive, we are unable to respond to each application individually. We trust that you will continue to explore all other opportunities available to you.

    DISCLAIMER

    DISCLAIMER

    AS PER THE RULES OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA, SUJATA CHAUDHRI IP ATTORNEYS IS NOT PERMITTED TO SOLICIT WORK OR ADVERTISE ITS LEGAL SERVICES. BY CLICKING ON THE “I AGREE” BUTTON BELOW, YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THE FOLLOWING

     

    • That you wish to access this website to obtain information about Sujata Chaudhri IP Attorneys for your own information and use.
    • Any information about Sujata Chaudhri IP Attorneys is provided to you only on your specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is/are completely at your volition.
    • Any use of this website does not create an attorney-client relationship.
    • The information provided on this website is solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.
    • Sujata Chaudhri IP Attorneys is not liable for any consequence of any action taken by you in reliance of the material/ information provided on this website. In cases where you have any legal issues, you must, in all cases, must seek independent legal advice.
    • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from Sujata Chaudhri IP Attorneys or any of its members to solicit any work through this website.