No Prima Facie Case When The Plaintiff By Way Of Agreement Has Granted A Free License To Defendant R
OWNER OF THE POPULAR SIGNATURE WHISKY SECURES AN INJUNCTION AGAINST USE OF A SIMILAR MARK FOR PAN MA
New .INDRP Rules – A Step in the Right Direction?
AAJ TAK – Sabse Tez in catching trademark infringers too
No free ride on EXIDE – The Delhi High Court’s decision in Exide Industries Ltd. v. Krishna Internat
AMUL BIDS FAREWELL TO FRAUDULENT WEBSITES
Rules of Procedure Are Hand Maiden To The Ends Of Justice: IPAB
ASTRAZENECA AB & ANR. VS. MICRO LABS LIMITED
Delhi High Court grants Disney dynamic injunction to block 118 rogue websites
Battle Over GLOW & HANDSOME: The ‘Un’fair Saga Continues
Copyright Infringement and Passing off: Bombay High Court’s ruling in ITC v. Godfrey Philips
Super Shine Industries restrained from using trademark and trade dress similar to Reckitt Benckiser’
Merck Obtains Ex-Parte Ad-Interim injunction
Export of a Patented Product in Commercial Quantities by a Non-Patentee Amounts to Infringement of P
Balancing commercial and research interests in a patent – The Delhi High Court’s judgment in Pfizer
Delhi High Court Injuncts User of Three-Letter Mark
An Un ‘Fair’ Battle Over GLOW & HANDSOME
Rights of a TM Proprietor v. Rights of a Permitted User
NOT PLAYING “NISE”
ISKCON declared as well-known trade mark by Bombay High Court